URGENT ALERT: Please beware of fraudulent WhatsApp groups and other groups across Social Media pretending to be affiliated with Anchor and Anchor staff members. Do not engage with these malicious and fraudulent groups in any way. Please direct all queries to invest@anchorcapital.co.za.

Uncovering the Hidden Costs: The Role of Emotional Biases in Investment Decisions

It is common for individual investors to underperform the market when it comes to returns, but have you ever wondered why? A 2023 DALBAR Quantitative Analysis of Investor Behaviour (QAIB) study uncovers a startling truth: Over the past 20 years, the average equity investor has lagged the S&P 500 by almost 4%. Surprisingly, this gap is attributed more to investor behaviour than the performance of the funds they invest in. What is behind this significant gap between market benchmarks and the average returns of individual investors?

Similarly, a 2019 report by Barclays indicates that emotional biases influence about 75% of retail investors’ decisions, leading to an average annual loss of nearly 3%. Despite the wealth of tools and information, why do many investors still make these costly errors?

The often-ignored answer lies in behavioural finance, which delves into the psychological aspects and biases influencing our investment choices. These biases can skew our judgement and lead us to make emotion-driven decisions.

This article will delve into the fascinating domain of behavioural finance and its impact on individual investors and broader financial markets. We will use three case studies to highlight the psychological pitfalls that can significantly sway market outcomes. More importantly, we will provide actionable insights to help you recognise and mitigate these biases in your investment strategy.

By the end of this article, you will have a comprehensive understanding of the psychological factors that influence financial decisions. You will also discover how to leverage this knowledge for your benefit. So, let us dive into the intricate psychological elements that shape our financial behaviour and its repercussions on investment outcomes.

Common emotional biases and their implications

These biases often shape our financial decisions:

Groupthink and the influence of social media: Nobel laureate Robert J. Shiller describes groupthink as a self-reinforcing cycle, emphasising that the sway of social influence has been around for a long time. In investment, groupthink can be particularly dangerous because it encourages conformity over critical thinking. Social media platforms amplify this effect by creating echo chambers where only similar opinions are voiced and validated. This can lead investors to decide based on popular sentiment rather than objective analysis. For example, when a particular stock trends on social media, the fear of missing out (FOMO) can drive investors to buy without adequate research. This herd mentality, fuelled by social media, can inflate asset bubbles and exacerbate market volatility. Groupthink and social media can cloud our judgement, making us susceptible to investment choices that may not align with our financial goals or risk tolerance.

Overconfidence: This bias can make us overly optimistic about our skills and the potential returns on investment, leading us to ignore warning signs or expert advice. For example, many amateur day traders enter the stock market believing they can easily outperform seasoned professionals, only to face significant losses. As Warren Buffett once said, “Overconfidence is the enemy of the rational investor.”

Loss aversion: According to psychologist Amos Tversky, “The emotional impact of a loss is twice that of a gain.” This psychological bias can have a profound effect on our investment decisions. The fear of losing money often outweighs the potential joy of making a profit, leading us to make choices that may not be in our best financial interest. For example, this loss aversion can cause investors to hold onto underperforming stocks far longer than they should, hoping that these stocks will rebound. This emotional attachment to avoiding loss can result in missed opportunities for higher returns in more promising investment avenues. Loss aversion can keep us in a financial rut, hindering our ability to make rational, forward-thinking decisions.

Case studies: The dot-com bubble, the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC), and the GameStop phenomenon

The dot-com bubble: A tale of overconfidence and herd behaviour

Timeline: Late 1990s to early 2000s

Overview: The dot-com bubble witnessed a meteoric rise and subsequent crash in tech and internet stocks. Investors, enticed by the allure of a “new economy,” invested heavily without adequate research.

Behavioural biases: Overconfidence and herd behaviour were prevalent. Investors felt invincible in a booming market and often followed the masses into tech investments without grasping the fundamentals.

Quote: Alan Greenspan, the then Federal Reserve Chairperson, cautioned against “irrational exuberance,” spotlighting the overconfidence permeating investor behaviour.

The 2008 GFC: Overconfidence meets loss aversion

Timeline: 2007-2008

Overview: The downfall of major financial institutions due to subprime mortgage exposure and government bailouts led to a significant decline in consumer wealth and market instability.

Behavioural biases: Overconfidence in the housing market and intricate financial products, coupled with loss aversion, were key players. Many investors clung to depreciating assets, hoping for a market recovery.

Quote: Ben Bernanke, the then Federal Reserve Chairperson, observed that “financial institutions’ risk management systems were inadequate,” highlighting systemic overconfidence in risk evaluation.

The GameStop saga: Individual investors challenge the financial elite

Timeline: January-February 2021

Overview: Online platforms like Reddit’s WallStreetBets became a rallying point for individual investors to buy GameStop shares. Many joined the cause without thorough analysis.

Behavioural biases: Overconfidence and herd behaviour were again at play. Individual investors became increasingly self-assured, thinking they could outsmart financial professionals.

Quote: Daniel Kahneman, renowned for his research on decision-making psychology, warns that “overconfidence is a potent source of delusions.”

Strategies to counteract biases

“Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Being willing is not enough; we must do,” Leonardo da Vinci wisely stated. Acknowledging that emotional biases exist is the first step, but applying this knowledge to our financial decisions is the task. So, how can we effectively steer through this maze of biases?

Self-reflection: The first line of defence is self-awareness. As Charlie Munger, vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway, suggests, “You don’t have to be a genius; just avoid making foolish decisions consistently.” Keeping an investment journal to document your thoughts, feelings, and the reasoning behind each investment can be invaluable.

Consulting experts: The adage “two heads are better than one” rings true in investment decisions. A trustworthy financial advisor can provide an impartial view and challenge your assumptions, helping you sidestep emotionally charged, rash decisions.

Portfolio diversification: As Warren Buffett advises, “Don’t put all your eggs in one basket.” Diversifying minimises your financial risk and dampens the emotional highs and lows of investing in a single stock.

Automated investment platforms: While not foolproof, algorithmic trading systems and robo-advisors can minimise the impact of emotional biases. These platforms make decisions based on set criteria, removing the emotional pitfalls that can cloud human judgement.


Behavioural economics is central to understanding market dynamics and why individual investors often commit predictable mistakes. Daniel Kahneman aptly says, “You’re neither rational nor irrational; you’re human.” This captures the essence of behavioural economics: our financial choices are deeply rooted in our emotional and cognitive limitations.

So, what is the takeaway? First, understanding emotional biases is an intellectual exercise and a practical toolkit enabling us to make improved financial decisions. From the historical lessons of the dot-com bubble and the 2008 GFC to the recent GameStop trading phenomenon, these case studies serve as tangible examples of the influence of emotional biases.

Second, the journey to becoming a more rational investor is ongoing. Even as you become more mindful of your biases, the dynamic nature of financial markets means new biases can arise. Continuous self-evaluation and adaptation are not optional; they are essential for long-term investment success.

Lastly, the intricacy of human behaviour means there is no one-size-fits-all solution. What works for one person may not work for another. Therefore, the quest for financial wisdom is a profoundly individual journey that demands introspective practices, expert advice, and continuous refinement of investment strategies.

In summary, behavioural economics equips us with the frameworks to comprehend the ‘why’ behind our financial choices, adding depth to our investment strategies. With this knowledge, we are better prepared to navigate our economic future.



Submit your details and we’ll give you a call back to assist and advise you on your investment.


Subscribe to our newsletters to receive regular market commentary, research and updates from the Anchor team. Select between our Individual or Financial Advisor newsletters by selecting the relevant tab below.

WEBINAR | The Navigator – Anchor’s Strategy and Asset Allocation, 2Q24

Anchor CEO and Co-CIO Peter Armitage will host the webinar, provide an introduction to current global and local market conditions and give his thoughts on offshore equities. Together with Head of Fixed Income and Co-CIO Nolan Wapenaar, Pete will also discuss Anchor’s strategy and asset allocation for 2Q24, focusing on global equities and bonds. In addition, Fund Manager Liam Hechter will provide insights into local equities, highlighting some investment ideas; Global Equities Analyst James Bennet will discuss Ferrari and give an update on Tesla, and finally, Analyst Thomas Hendricks will participate in a Q&A with Peter, explaining the 10-year US Treasury to attendees.